The New York Times on Monday offered a compelling portrait of Kashi Nelson, who teaches at a Brooklyn charter school targeted for takeover by teachers unions. Nelson first opposed and then embraced and then opposed unionization again, personifying a struggle for the heart and soul of charter schools taking place across the country.
Explains the Times:
"Ms. Nelson’s shift from union skeptic to supporter and back again provides a glimpse of the complicated and tense dance between charter schools and unions unfolding across the country. As the number of charter schools in New York City and elsewhere swells, unions have become increasingly aggressive in trying to organize their teachers.
These two major forces in education politics, having long faced off in ideological opposition, have begun in some places to enter tentative and cautious partnerships, and in others to engage in fierce combat. New York City’s teachers’ union now runs two charter schools in Brooklyn and workers have organized at many more, including more than a dozen across New York State.
Some of the most adamant supporters of charter schools say that the teachers’ union is simply trying to stymie their growth by increasing the regulations on their operation; union leaders, on the other hand, say they are just trying to ensure that teachers are given fair pay and clear guidelines for how and why they could be dismissed."
Having
largely lost the battle to stop the schools, unions have adopted a new
strategy -- of destroying them from within by infiltrating and
organizing their staffs. And with legislation pending before Congress
that would make unionizing the workplace as simple as gathering enough
signatures -- the so-called card check bill -- this assault on the
independence of charter schools is only likely to spread and escalate.
Freedom from union influence is one of the distinguishing
characteristics of charter schools; indeed, it's one of the secrets to
their success. It's what leaves the teachers free to teach, without
constant reference to what's "in the contract." It's what leaves school
administrators free to manage, without butting heads with
obstructionists within. Absent is the adversarial relationship between
"management" and "workers" that unions feed upon. These schools put the
interest of students first and teachers second. And that's why unions
want to obliterate that distinction.
Teachers have a choice of
working at a charter school or a conventional public school. They're
intelligent enough to understand the trade-offs involved. Many choose
the former over the latter because of the apathy and antipathy unions
frequently bring to the workplace. Thus, the idea that unions are
coming to the rescue of beleaguered charter school teachers is
ridiculous.
Many of these teachers have fled to charters to
escape the unhealthy and unproductive influence of unions, as Nelson
was when she took the job in Brooklyn. But the unions refuse to let
charter schools and charter school teachers (not to mention charter
school students and parents) go their own way, insisting that
uniformity, conformity, lethargy and mediocrity permeate public
education in America, without exception.
If allowed to go
unchecked, the union takeover of charters schools threatens to
undermine and eventually destroy one of the few real innovations
American public education has enjoyed in recent times.
But a
more practical, bottom-line motivation also lurks behind the takeovers.
The popularity of charters has the tide turning decisively against
unions. It represents a steady drain on union membership, union dues
and union power -- which is all most unions care about anyway. Unless
they find a way to co-opt charters, not only will unions experience a
continuing decline in membership and money, but America will before
long have two public school systems existing side my side.
One
system, free from union influence, will be succeeding, while the other,
anchored down by union dominance, will be failing. And that will be the
most glaring evidence yet of the cancerous influence these
organizations have had on American public education.
~
Sean Paige is the founder and editor of Local Liberty Online. His writing has appeared in many of America’s top newspapers and periodicals. He blogs at American Contrarian.
See archived columns »




