The United Nations and human rights do not belong in the same sentence. In early June the UN Human Rights Council praised Cuba’s human rights achievements.  The Council was far more concerned about the U.S. embargo against Cuba than the Cuban government's brutality towards its own people.

The UN long has claimed to represent the greatest aspirations of humanity, running back to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which was approved more than six decades ago.  But the UN’s Commission on Human Rights routinely embarrassed the “international community.” 

Often dominated by human rights abusers, the body routinely white-washed oppressive governments and spent much of its time attacking Israel.  It was one of Turtle Bay’s finest comedy clubs—only the performances were underwritten by U.S. taxpayers.

Three years ago the Commission was replaced by the Human Rights Council in a vain attempt to improve operations.  The Bush administration refused to dignify the body with America’s presence, but in March the Obama administration announced its decision to return.  Doing so obviously was a mistake.

The membership list reads like a Who’s Who of repressive regimes:  Angola, Egypt, Gabon, China, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Azerbaijan, Russia, and Cuba.  Authoritarian states have an obvious incentive to go easy on their fellow autocracies.  Even worse, these member governments view violating human rights as a positive good.

As part of its commitment to human rights, the Council conducts an annual review—which culminates in a three hour debate on the nation’s human rights record. 

No surprise, these reviews are superficial.  But Cuba’s record isn’t hard to assess.  The State Department helpfully summarizes the Cuban record in its annual human rights report:

“The following human rights problems were reported:  beatings and abuse of detainees and prisoners, including human rights activists, carried out with impunity; harsh and life-threatening prison conditions, including denial of medical care; harassment, beatings, and threats against political opponents by government-recruited mobs, police, and State Security officials; arbitrary arrest and detention of human rights advocates and members of independent professional organizations; denial of fair trial; and interference with privacy, including pervasive monitoring of private communications.”

The group Freedom House ranks Cuba at the bottom in both political rights and civil liberties.  Freedom House compiles a special report on freedom of the press and, not surprisingly, ranks Cuba as “not free” in this category as well:  “state security agents continued to threaten, arrest, detain, imprison, and restrict the right of movement of local and foreign journalists throughout the year.”

Cuba also is one of the worst violators of religious liberty.  Last month the United States Commission on International Religious Freedom placed Cuba on its Watch List since “Within this reporting period, the government expanded its efforts to silence critics of its religious freedom policies and crack down on religious leaders whose churches operate outside of the government-recognized umbrella organizations for Protestant denominations.”

None of these incidents made it into the UN’s official debate, if it can be called that, on Cuba:

“In the discussion on Cuba, speakers said Cuba had withstood many tests, and continued to uphold the principles of objectivity, impartiality and independence in pursuance of the realization of human rights.  Cuba was and remained a good example of the respect for human rights, including economic, social and cultural rights.  The Universal Periodic Review of Cuba clearly reflected the progress made by Cuba and the Cuban people in the protection and promotion of human rights, and showed the constructive and responsive answer of Cuba to the situation of human rights.  Cuba was the victim of an unjust embargo, but despite this obstacle, it was very active in the field of human rights.  The trade, financial and economic blockade by the United States should be brought to an end, as it was the primary obstacle to the full development of Cuba.”

In short, the problem is not the brutality of the Castros’ regime.  It is the American trade embargo—counterproductive in my view, but ignored by everyone else and actually used by the Cuban government to enhance its control.  As my Cato Institute colleague Juan Carlos Hidalgo put it, “This is not from The Onion, but the UN.”

Needless to say, the Cuban government was pleased.  The Cuban Interests Section (which acts as Havana’s de facto embassy) put out a press release headlined:  “Cuba recognized in the Human Rights Council.”  Rather than advancing the cause of human liberty, the Council is providing cover for the oppressors and persecutors. 

Human rights.  United Nations.  Never shall the twain meet, except in a tiresome comedy routine in an expensive club operating out of a famed high-rise in New York’s Turtle Bay.

~

Doug Bandow is a Senior Fellow at the Cato Institute.  A former Special Assistant to President Ronald Reagan, he is the author of several books, including Foreign Follies:  America’s New Global Empire (Xulon Press).